About the latest BC/CCC sighting: An actress/artist/musician wannabe with a music school tweeting, posting on Instagram and Facebook under the hashtag #monkeylovescumberbatch about BC and his kid at her class. How very self-promotional and AGAIN from someone with connections to the acting/music industry. And (SHC’s associate) the–cbatches picks it up FROM ALL of that teacher’s social media channels (Twitter, Facebook and Instagram). And that lara-person (teacher, actress) has a connection to actor Tobias Menzies. She has not even 300 followers but Menzies is one of them. Plus Menzies himself doesn’t follow more than 300 people so one can assume that him and Lara do know each other, why else follow her? Menzies as you recall was at the wedding as SH’s guest AND he published some old pics with him and SH at a music festival on his FB page. A page that is for the most part empty for the public and yet ONE photo album was made public for everyone to see namely the one with SH in it…
************************************************
GNA: Thanks Anon! Wow, this is definitely interesting. It makes you think doesn’t it?
Oh, and by the way, the FB post is gone now because of the UberNan police! Thanks to a lovely skeptic bts for the screenshot.
Oh nannies. Silly little nannies. They just don’t get it.
One has to wonder: why are they writing Cumberfiction instead of Weirdofiction? The Tobias Menzies connection points to Weirdo after all…
Is it because no one bothers looking through social media for Weirdo mentions (not even Nans)?
I was wondering about that too @annashipper ,
if this is from sh’s side, why not involve something like ‘sophie is
the nicest and prettiest lady in the world’ in the post… or something
along those lines. Well, it’s fiction all the same until we get proper
evidence.
*Re-blog for additional submit from the same Anon:
So here we have the Lara-person getting scolded by some BC-fans. I wonder if this counts as “evil harassment” (for the record I DON’T THINK SO) but I am just asking since there are SH’s buddies out there who claim that fans doing that is harassment *roles eyes*.
Alsolara-person tweets back at that lichtblick BC-fan that she was careful not to tag “the actor’s profile”. Well. BC doesn’t have any profiles but Lara DID use BC’s name very well visible AND even mentions “Sherlock”. Not so innocent at all, Lara.
Oh and then lichtblick tweets her a screenshot of (SHC’s affiliate) The–CBatches tumblr post. But of course a reblog from another BC fan who reblogged from the–cbatches, because no no the SH promotion account can’t get scolded, can it?
GNA: Awwww, look at the nans ‘safe-guarding’ BC’s privacy! What would he do without them?
It just keeps getting better and better and better and better and better and better and better
and better
and better
and better
and better
and better 😀
I’m throwing this out there because this is a nice recap 😊
If one thinks of content marketing this is one way (of many but common) to do it.
In content marketing your goal is to tell a story about what you want to sell rather than to brainwash people with annoying pictures or slogans which more likely would put them off. 🤕
So marketers nowadays follow the idea that people become more aware of something and spread the word easier, when there’s talk about it one way or another because a conversation creates emotions and what the conversation was about sticks easier in people’s heads.
People who are emotionally involved with something tend to share their emotions and if the emotion is about a product or a story, they share the product or the story. Many people talking, amplifies the message, amplified message – more coverage. To put it very simple.
All one has to do now is to put the story together, create one or more fake accounts or pay third parties, then poke the bear.
Fake accounts are not only useful to deceive and spread lies, they are also good to attract buddies. Fake accounts don’t necessarily pop up fulfill 1 task and for the next task there will be another fake account.
No. Fake accounts can be maintained as long as they fulfill a purpose and that is also desired. Anyone can become friends with a fake account on social media. That’s useful because people tend to listen more to people they trust and consider “friend” than to strangers.
A new blogger tells you “Go and see Doctor Strange it’s a good movie, I’ve seen it and you’ll like it” has less chance that you go and buy a ticket than your friend who recommends the movie to you.
However that of course is very time consuming and not applicable depending on the life span of your product, especially if it’s transitory.
So any story to sell can be completely made up or it can be a real story that’s worth to share (Have you noticed how much people know about Doctor Strange’s cloak?)
It can be fake accounts and real accounts talking or only fake accounts talking to each other.
Then you throw out a piece of information to get the conversation started and all you have to do is to wait until someone (preferably a paying customer) picks it up and you start replying to it. Of course don’t forget to tag the hell out of it, so that you can be found by everyone else, too 😄
Twitter is usually not the right place to educate people about a whole storyline and to deliver huge amounts of information because of its limited characters and possibilities.
However it’s good to start a story by just dropping a few lines or to fuel a story you placed before somewhere else, then Twitter can certainly help to keep it going and draw attention. 😋
Are we even entertaining the possibility that 3CPilo was there at all? Zero’s unpaid-but-keen-to-do-their-mistress’-bidding PR would say just about anything.
If Zero is in the trouble I think she is with “creditors”, she may have asked that this be posted to make it look like all is well…while she scrambles to pay off said debts. She’s probably trying to convince them that she has access to Benedict’s money, etc to buy time.
I don’t think said creditors are quite as fond of fairystories as SoFail seems to be…
