“I have never seen a class so deeply demoralised, so incurably debased by selfishness, so corroded within, so incapable of progress, as the English bourgeoisie. For it nothing exists in this world, except for the sake of money, itself not excluded. It knows no bliss save that of rapid gain, no pain save that of losing gold. In the presence of this avarice and lust of gain, it is not possible for a single human sentiment or opinion to remain untainted.”
— Friedrich Engels, The Condition of the Working Class in England
you don’t have to prove that someone is abusive in order to cut them out of your life, if they’re wasting your time and energy, draining you, making you feel miserable, putting way less effort in communicating than you are, blocking your thoughts and opinions, triggering you, making you cry, causing you pain, making you feel awful about yourself – you can cut them off with no further reason needed “I need different things in life right now” is a reason enough.
You have to admit that it’s an accurate take on bougie eateries that use gimmicks to justify charging extortionate prices for subpar food. Like Dirt Candy with their bland AF broccoli dogs…
That was way before the internet was even a thing, you idiot. I’ve always been a bookworm and heard first-hand accounts of corruption which taught me how the real world works early on. I walk quite a bit, in fact my work requires it and there is no shortage of greenery around. I also interact with more people than you certainly do on a day to day basis. You have everything backwards, the whole world has gone mad but you are too deranged yourself to realize it.
Truth is a Weapon
Continuing what Obomba began 🤦…
20 Language Memes And Fails For Cunning Linguists
The Century of the Self : Happiness Machines
Story at a glance
- A new petition asks the Supreme Court to revisit a 1981 ruling that excluded women from the U.S. military draft.
- Women have been officially allowed to serve in combat since 2013.
A new petition issued from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has made it to the Supreme Court and aims to declare the historic male-only military draft to be unconstitutional.
Noting that the U.S. Department of Defense lifted the ban on women serving in combat in 2013, the petition specifies that the obligation for men to register upon turning 18 years old has yet to be applied to women.
“Thousands of women have since served with distinction in combat positions across all branches of the military,” the formal petition reads. “The registration requirement has no legitimate purpose and cannot withstand the exacting scrutiny sex-based laws require.”
Rooted in this argument is the 1981 case Rostker v. Goldberg, which argued that because American men are required to register under U.S. law and women are not, the male-only draft is discriminatory and unconstitutional.
The act gives U.S. presidents the power to require mandatory conscription of eligible adult males into the U.S. Army, but excludes women. Ultimately, the court held that the act does not violate equal protection clauses under the Fifth Amendment, and that the government is allowed to develop an army in times of national emergency.
Now, the petition asks the Supreme Court to overrule Rostker v. Goldberg since women are formally allowed to register for military service and in combat roles.
“It is time to overrule Rostker. The registration requirement has no legitimate purpose and cannot withstand the exacting scrutiny sex-based laws require,” the petition states, citing that military departments acknowledge that requiring both men and women to register would “’promote fairness and equity’ and further the goal of military readiness.”
The Department of Defense has made strides in including women in combat roles, authoring a report in 2015 that called its own previous standards excluding women from military work “outdated.”
In 2017, a committee was established to review the draft policy within the Military Selective Service Act to evaluate if the draft should be expanded to incorporate women recruits. Despite a commission analysis that recommended the inclusion, Congress has yet to make the requirement for women official.
The Washington Post further notes that last week, a group of veterans who held military leadership roles asked the Supreme Court to take the case and rule the male-only draft requirement a violation of the equal protection clause.
“The vast majority of men . . . have no advantage in readiness over women, who the current statutory scheme forbid from registering,” the brief, filed by former National Security Agency (NSA) director Michael Hayden, reportedly said.
Debate over whether or not the draft requirement for men is constitutional has ensued in multiple lower courts, but these revitalized petitions ask the Supreme Court to overturn their original 1981 ruling.
The petition’s authors also note that by excluding women from draft registration requirements, it undermines their own equality as U.S. citizens.
“Like many laws that have purported to privilege women over men, the men-only registration requirement burdens women too by perpetuating the notion that women are unworthy of ‘full citizenship stature,’” the report concludes, citing another Supreme Court case regarding the treatment of women in the military. “Excluding women from a duty characterized as a ‘fundamental civic obligation’ conveys ‘not only that they are not vital to the defense of the country but also that they are not expected to participate in defending it.‘”
The Supreme Court could reportedly take months before deciding to revisit Rostker v. Goldberg.
Published on Feb 19, 2021
I can’t wait to see how this pans out.
a good gender neutral term to use is “fool”
A while back you spoke disparingingly of Benedict while claiming that you liked SoHoes like SoFail. You are now saying that there is something wrong with anyone that believes in Q. I know that it is a military PsyOp and have said so dozens of times already. That being said those drops do contain valuable kernels of truth not just strategic disinformation. I know because quite a bit of that intel is consistent with what I’ve found via my own independent research. FYI I’ve been doing this since I was 15! Furthermore Rabbi Antelman wrote the book I linked to, he’s as Jewish as they come but the Sabbatean-Frankists he exposes sure as hell aren’t. You are using a VPN from Indonesia, the coup d’etat against a Globalist puppet was in Burma. Your alleged country is still firmly in the grip of the Globalists, Q is allegedly run by their Humanist rivals. Nothing you say makes any sense but it does tell me who you really work for. I keep track of y’all so please stop wasting my time with this scripted crap.