Meghan Markle to Guest Edit Forthcoming September Issue of Vogue
Hi Skippy, although the gay guys at the DataLounge have interesting opinions about Tumblr users, IMO these Anons have an eye for all things Vogue.
Please forgive me, I cannot see the link to the thread. Do a search for DataLounge, then search Markle & the threads will appear.
It seems that Markle tries to shut down their threads. Thankfully she failed & what we have is over 350 responses of comedic genius.
I’m not sure if this will work, but I’ll attempt to copy & paste as many as Anons as possible w/o response #.
You’ll see where they allow her to interrupt their convo & then take her & her stans to the woodshed. They also create a parody of this mess in her “voice.” I hope this works & everyone enjoys. Blessings, NE
Skipping
X-Because trail-blazing women read VOGUE!
X-Brits are pissed. Wonder if the reverse psychology will drive up sales?
X-Oh, please, Lord. Let her also do the proofreading!
After all, she’s so well-spoken, she of the golden tongue.
X-All her vast editing experience will certainly come in handy here!
X-She knows so much about fashion, though! Vogue NEEDS her
X-Holy lip injections, Batman! How many years until she “Real Housewives” her entire face?
X-she’s been there done that already. Several nose jobs. . Botox. Facial fillers. Lip injections removed and replaced. Breast implants removed. Adderall for her emaciated phase.
X-X- Some examples of her bad plastic surgery
see offsite link on tumblr.com
X-she looks more cross-eyed than usual there. And her lips… *quacks*
X-That photo of her reminds me of Helen Keller. Patty Duke as Helen Keller in “The Miracle Worker”.
Her eyes aren’t focused on anything and her mouth is agape like she’s trying to form some ineffable WORD, and she’s about to make the sign for “jacket” and you wish Anne Bancroft would appear and slap her.
X-and she dresses like her, too.
X-A Very Special Issue of Vogue: From Suits to Sparkling Tiaras
X-She has no sense of fashion or personal style, ironic she’s guest-editing Vogue.
X-So the cover features Jacinda Arden who wants a debate on axing the Queen as head of state, and Jameela Jamil who once mocked the Queen’s tits. Well done Rachel, well done.
X-As a kiwi, i find that hilarious! There’s no way MM did not know about Jacinda’s viewpoint. And suggesting that it’s “boastful” to appear on the cover knowing full well that Kate did it. Meghan is such a nasty little bitch. May the bridges she burns light the way!
X-The Daily Mail is on the attack today. Multiple articles blasting MM about this Vogue collaboration. But this is the most delicious find. She basically stole the idea from a book she worked on in Australia, and the authors are putting MM on blast.
X-The nerve of her to say she didn’t want to be on the cover because it would seem “boastful.” Boasting is her raison d’etre.
X-Really?! I mean – REALLY?! She’s been married to the sixth in line for one year and suddenly she’s the country’s most influential beacon of change??!!
Nowhere is there a single mention of the fact that without her recent marriage VOGUE and Enninful wouldn’t given Meghan Markle the time of day, nor would Salma Hayak – who, as Jan Moir pointed out, it married to a billionaire whose companies’ products are being advertised throughout the issue.
It would be nice to think that the Palace is allowing this because there is already an agreement in place that she gets to build her brand if she and Harry leave the BRF in three years, or something like that. But I doubt it. They’re clearly incap
X-Gawd she’s so annoying. You married a homely dolt for money and a royal title. Enjoy it. Stop trying to convince us you’re Angelina Jolie x Mother Theresa.
X-She definitely wrote the forward to the “interview” with Michelle: I, I, I, my, my, my, me, me, me, references to food, purple prose…all her hallmarks. Funny thing is, this isn’t really trending and it will probably be forgotten in a couple of days. Maybe other outlets will take note and not bother with her.
X-What a coincidence…the Vogue photographer Peter Lindbergh also took Meghan’s pre-engagement photos ofr her Vanity Fair cover.
X-Archie sounds like something you’d name your dog. Not a prince.
X-Meghan “slammed for wading into politics”…She really doesn’t get it.
X-When will her highness get a fashion icon award? Soon I hope. So deserved bless.
X-If you want to see her true colors and how unfit for the job is, watch this video.
At 1:07 she pulls back her coat so that cameras can get a better shot of her pregnant belly. Are you serious?
At 6:00 she proves she completely does not care about the elderly, or anyone there. She asks the same question over and over and when they give her a gift of a photo album, she immediately hands it to an assistant and leaves.
Harry should have chosen a better actress. One that was more convincing at pretending to care. see offsite link on youtube.com
X-WTF? Meghan wears a 2,300 pound Gucci dress on a visit to a charity that donates clothes to disadvantaged women. Oh thy name is hypocrisy! Everything she does is in her own self-interest. Does anyone think she was truly interested in Michelle’s answers? No. She just wants to be associated with someone with a higher profile. It seems like everyone except her fans is now aware of this.
X-she’s acting out “candid behind-the-scenes fashion mag I’m concentrating/channelling Diana Vreeland.” I’m convinced she conceives her life as magazine shoots. From the 90s.
X-How did she “involve” herself in the artwork? Did she draw smthg by hand or on the computer? Did she come up with the concept art? Or did she just show up and choose the version she liked best?
X-Well, I guess she copied the cover photo artwork from her Australian magazine gig, so maybe they mean that.
XEven an asshole like Piers Morgan can be right sometimes.
XFrom the comment section for Pier Morgan’s article (can’t stand him, but still). T, new york, United States, 1 day ago
Meghan…………………… – ………………………… – ……Embarrassing, Embarassing, Embarrassing and more Embarrassing. The Queen will need a whole day of talking with her. But we know it will fall on deaf ears. 17425 upvotes vs 760 downvotes. It appears that the people who will demand that Archie rule have already voted.
XYour Royal Awesomeness, why would you pick the anorexia and model trafficking supporter Vogue, with its ads for $50,000 jewelry and dresses, as your platform? Just wondering.
P.S. in that black and white cross eyed picture of you, your hair looks like my scrub daddy after a month. Why?
X-If I were her PR team, I would line her up for some events that would make sense that she cares about.
X-By the looks of it she’d enjoy a donut tasting.
X-“she isn’t that fat” lol
She would have incurred less anger if she had done the American edition of VOGUE rather than the British edition. And she probably would have sold more copies, too.
X-The only anger that matters is that of the BRF. They’re letting her do whatever she likes, and they clearly don’t care that she is angering the British electorate with her brand of simpering elite wokeism. Whatever we previously assumed about signals from the BRF are obviously wishful thinking. Meghan is getting exactly what she wanted: a platform built by someone else from which to launch herself as the A-List celebrity she always envisioned herself as.
X-One finds the Trollop common, One finds her unsophisticated. One recalls the last Duchess One made rid of. Conveniently, she now lives at Frogmore Cottage for eternity.
—Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother
X-Apparently Meghan and Harry have told their neighbours not to speak to them. I was against a lot of the attacks on Meghan for a while but starting to agree that she’s in this for no one but herself.
X-Her diva antics at Wimbledon were really pissing people off.
X-Somebody do a Vogue editorial as Tig-era Sparkle with misused hundred-dollar words
X-Well, it’s hard to save the world when you work 9 to 5 every day. But I can still live my best life, right? Does Meghan advise on how to do that?
X-I didn’t start out hating ME! either, but she’s such a ridiculous fk-up it’s embarrassing to watch
X-There is no lane big enough for Meghan.
X-Meghan fans, whose eyes and minds weren’t opened even after her Wimbledon diva stunt, even now you have to admit some deeply pathological truths about Meghan. Misleading Vogue readership with claims of interviewing the truly lovely Michelle Obama over a lunch of chicken tacos, when in reality it was nothing more than series of email exchanges making up the said interview for Vogue magazine. Do you not see a very distinct pattern, a trail of self-promotion? Why would she have lied/ misrepresented about the interview in such ways unless it’s to signal to the public that at last she had the same gravitas as someone like Michelle Obama. Everything Meghan does is calculated in its self-serving end and this story isn’t really surprising to those of us who have seen through her thirstiness from the very beginning. Face it, stories about her past as a thirsty climber were confirmative warnings of her recent behavior as member of the BRF. She’s gotten a taste for the sort of fame and adulation than she could never have imagined, and now she will not stop at basking in the spotlight. Sadly for Meghan, she’s too dumb to realize that being in the spotlight doesn’t automatically equal public adoration particularly is her behavior continues to be so transparently distasteful.
X-The article in the Express focuses on Meghan’s Editor’s Letter in which she admits that editing the September VOGUE issue was Meghan’s idea from the start – modest little thing that she is. And in her Letter, Gawd ‘elp us, if she didn’t use that loathsome nonword, “impactful”. For shallow, vapid, trendy, celebrity worshipping bullshit, this stunt hasn’t its equal.
X-Leo McKinistry in the SUN also slams her, and she does appear to have taken a pot-shot at Kate for appearing on the cover some years ago.
X-It’s beyond sickening in its overweeining self-regard. And two of the women mentioned are or were married to billionaires: Fonda and Hayek. Absent her marriage to Pinault, Hayak would be a middle-aged fading B-list actress today,
X-I’m not sure whether the statement from BP is actually from the Queen’s chief or the Sussex’s own, who also operate out of BP.
X-Meghan’s going to provide years of fun for DLers, but I doubt the senior members of the BRF are of the same mind.
X-Well, they opened the golden gates to the Trojan Whore and they can take the consequences. For permitting this kind of celebrity charlatanism, they deserve everything they get.
X-The whole intent of “interview over lunch” for the casual reader who only skims through articles is very misleading. Although she’s covering her own ass by admitting that she probably should have called MO instead for the interview. It’s shit like this that shows how Meghan is devious but does just enough to cover her own ass if ever she’s caught up in a lie. It betrays a calculated mind at work.
X-This popcorn is soooooo good.
X-Head over to Celebitchy – they don’t give a tinker’s curse that she sought this project out for herself, that she lied about her “lunch” with Michelle Obama, that the whole thing is aoun exercise in self-promotion and branding, and that she is quickly overshadowing her husband, who is getting dimmer by the moment, and not just upstairs, but literally. He’s now the man who married Meghan Markle; she started out as the woman who finally caught Prince Harry. Now he’s the man married to Meghan Markle. Charles should be ashamed that he’s allowed his son to end up this way.
X-*changed her PERSONA with every husband.
X-I’d go further than that, she changes persona with every public outing, that’s how fake of a person she is because she lacks a solid core personality. The fake one that she’s created in order to gain attention, fame, and adulation is also one that’s eve-changing or evolving, it’s the nature of the beast so to speak.
X- Why does it matter? Because she accepts taxpayer funding from all UK taxpayers, not just liberal ones, that’s why. That’s why the monarchy has to be seen to be politically neutral: they are the monarchy for the nation, not just the woke. That stupid bitch in her self-regard is either too dumb to grasp this, or to self-interested to care.
When she refuses to accept any more funding from the Sovereign Grant and live on her husband’s earnings from his trust fund, and tells people she no longer wants curtsies and bows, then come talk to me about why it matters.
X-It seems that fame has gone to her head. Am I wrong?
X-She’s been working on this for seven months? Really.
X-Ironically most of the women who do the work of making change happen, and caring or campaigning look exactly like you describe – with a few extra pounds and the every day ‘frumpiness’ of not having a stylist, botox, and a limitless clothing budget.
X-People who swan around ‘saving the world’ annoy me – the real work is hard, thankless, un-glamorous, and rarely photogenic.
X-If she was going to do this at all, it should have been a Greatest of Great Britain or a Best of the Commonwealth or both. It should have been a celebration of unsung charity heroes, and unsung British design, music, theatre, fashion, conservation, innovation, all within the lens of a celebration of all that is exciting and wonderful about her adopted country. It should have been one huge appreciation-fest.
Instead we have her interviewing a past First Lady of the United States and using the word “I” and “me” so many times it was eyewatering, featuring a politician who wants to axe the Queen, and highlighting no-name actresses who have insulted the Queen’s breasts and who have publicly called for Meghan to replace Charles as head of the Commonwealth. And she brazenly broke rule No. 1 of British Royalty: NO POLITICS.
X-I didn’t think anything could overtake the Baby Shower debacle in terms of fueling public hate for her (well, Wimbledon) but this outstrips even the shower. She’s really done it this time. There is no coming back for her anymore. Not ever.
X-One has to wonder how desperate the Obamas are for attention, if they’re responding to a C-list actress acting badly.
X-Somewhere Diana is laughing her ass off.—Sarah Ferguson
X-Yup!
X-So a lot of fudging on the “interview” with Michelle Obama making it a more intimate affair than it was in reality. Then comes the revelation that it was Meghan who asked Vogue if she could guest edit, the result of which is being derided today by all consensus as patronizing, self-aggrandizing, tone-deaf, vanity project, and just not very good in effort regardless of editor/ position of editor. Meghan has it in her warped mind that this is equivalent to a high school yearbook vanity project, which by the looks of it she couldn’t even manage doing a good job today.
X-It also says a lot about Meghan that the most important, influential women today are celebrities, former celebrities now married to wealthy/ powerful men, woke IG activists-glorified models, women whose being define their wokeness as opposed to actual body of work, these encompass most of the women on her list. No actual professional women who are experts in their fields or leaders of organizations, no scientists, health professionals, educators, etc… If you don’t fit into the profile of rich, glamorous, or loaded with connections then she has no time for you let alone put you on her list of important women.
X-You just have ask yourself what Ja’mie would do in any of these situations and it becomes crystal clear — MM is Ja’mie.
X-I thought Michelle was smarter than this, if it is true.
X-Oh, Jesus. “ever-burgeoning bump”? That sounds like the DL poster who parodies her. Why did she feel the need to mention what they had for lunch? Why did she have to brag that “my friend” Michelle sent her a message on Mother’s Day? “Look guize! Michelle Obama is my friend!”
Now, I think that Michelle Obama is awesome, but if I were British, then I would be PISSED to see this interview in British Vogue.
X-Oh, Jesus. “ever-burgeoning bump”? That sounds like the DL poster who parodies her.Absolutely, especially because it’s inaccurate: pregnancy bumps are not “ever-burgeoning”: they go away after nine months.
X-I love Meghan, she’s a gossip gift that’s going to continue giving. This alone, apparently a quote from her intro to the Michelle Obama “interview”, is hilarious:
Oh gurl, bless you for thinking that anyone would want to read your banter with Michelle. Here she is, a fucking duchess, and she’s still writing basic Tig posts.
X-Any time anyone criticizes her on the BRF threads, they’re immediately attacked by her fans. I actually was hopeful for her when she appeared on the radar: I had never seen her before, so I had no real opinion. But, since the wedding, there have been so many gaffes that criticizing her (lack of) fashion sense seems pretty innocent. I didn’t start out disliking her, but I now dislike her immensely, especially after the “no photographs” stunt at Wimbledon. She’s tone-deaf to a almost pathological degree.
X-She’s getting a TON of shit for this all over the place. The issues are the same raised here. X had a good point – all these women are celebrities, models, married well, etc. No real working women who are “in the trenches” so to speak.
X-Megs has been ready to guest edit Vogue ever since she watched 13 Going On 30! Every time she steps out in public she strikes me as someone who is playing a role, except she’s a terrible actress and her sources are shitty Hollywood romcoms.
X-Meghan may not be on the cover but she sure is featured inside the magazine.
X-She really is like the second coming of the Duchess of Windsor. A vapid American famewhore who’s a ruthless climber and whose only goal in life is to be famous and hang around celebrities. She’s Wallis 2.0.
Wallis was always impeccably dressed, however.
X- I’d guess that as soon as she got married to that dimwit, she started working on her bucket list. As HRH Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, she was ready to throw her weight around. She must have approached them when she was barely a newlywed, and didn’t have a shit-ton of faux pas and egregious gaffes under her belt yet. They probably agreed rather quickly. I’m sure Sunshine Sachs had a hand in. I wonder what those meetings were like. Oy. And how many times she must have mentioned it.
X-This quote really sums her up. The implication that they were lunching together, that they are “familiar” “friends” who shared a “secret”, the sheer effrontery. When ALL it was, was a batch of typed up questions emailed to M Obama, which she answered by return email.
Also, I find the omission of Amal Clooney really interesting. At least she’s got bona fide credentials unlike Salma Hayek. But if MM is hoping to trade Givenchy for Gucci, I can’t wait for more fashion disasters.
X-The f-is Laverne Cox doing on the cover? Does anyone in Britain even know who she is? Or Christy Turlington, for that matter
X-Salma Hayek would be long-forgotten if she hadn’t spread her cooch for that gross billionaire. How feminist! How inspiring!
X-The complete and total lack of self-awareness and delusions of some celebrities never ceases to amaze
X-The more Meghan tries to cast herself as a selfless individual of contemplative, deep nature, the more craven she comes across to people who are increasingly aware of just how narcissistic she is. Laughable really, because if you’re a genuine, deep thinking, caring individual, you don’t have to constantly say it in public, it should all be there for all to appreciate via your actions. Writing in Vogue, Meghan says she has “no fear of depths and great fear of shallow living”. But I think what she really means is that she has no fear of depths (for lying/ self-aggrandizing behavior/ social climbing) and great fear of shallow living (as in shallow pocketbooks).
Her nose is getting longer judging from this video clip. Aging and lying hitting her hard.
X-Salma Hayek, another one of those self-declared, proud to be ethnic and feminist celebrities who have undergone rhinoplasty and breast implants. She mega-sized her already ample but sagging tits by getting implants, but in doing so she looks even more top heavy and stumpier than she already was before. Then to top it off she denies ever having any plastic surgery.
X-What happened there? I know Vogue is not exactly deep, but was the copy editor gone the past “7 months” Markle “worked” on her vanity project? The only other explanation is that she refused to be edited as a condition of involvement. Poor concept, abysmal execution.
X-Since gay Enninful, 47, became CE of Vogue in 2017, he’s done nothing but party with D list celebs like Ducky Thot and Liam Payne. He is a hoe.
X-What is up with this new Vogue editor? A sinking magazine associated with the loathesome Wintour, and he chooses Markle to splash out? Either he realized his mistake too late and let her hang herself, a la BRF, or he is just an incompetent idiot. Either way it’s all on him.
X-That’s shady Brit-speak for ‘Don’t look at me, I’m not responsible – she’s the one who reached out to us!’
X -It’s time for Anna Wintour to retire, which was obvious when she started loving the Kartrashians.
X-The THIRD post from the Sussex Royal Instagram site about Meghan’s Vogue issue. She’s milking it for all its worth.
Harry and Jane Goodall – “This special sit-down was requested by The Duchess of Sussex, who has long admired Dr. Goodall and wanted to feature her in the September issue of @BritishVogue, which HRH has guest edited”.
So as you know, if Meghan didn’t want it to happen, it would never have taken place. I hope we’re all straight on that issue. offsite link on instagram.com—Eye Roll
X-clear as day all that “bump” cradling was just a ploy for attention too. I knew she was self-centred ever since her “me, I, myself, me again” UN (women) speech. But I thought she was smarter than to lay it bare so publicly, letting every adult reading her editorial know she’s transparently “thirsty”.
X-I’m female and back when I occasionally used Facebook, I used to see this all the time. Middle-aged women I went to HS with not realizing how transparent their efforts to project a certain image were. And too stupid to realize how much personal info their cumulative posts share with the entire world.
If you simply follow the formula, and graciously do everything that is expected of your role (and nothing more) it is easier to control the narrative. The Cambridges (or their people) get this. So they release birthday photos, holiday cards, birth announcements, etc.
X-She’s not that fat. She’s not that bad. Sure jans.
X-It’s a recurring joke that the Mountbattens & Markle use taxpayer funds to charity-fund their own lifestyles, while positioning themselves as charity gurus for others. It’s a type of Doublethink, where they can’t (or won’t) even acknowledge this deep contradiction.RMM cannot help herself, she needs to comment:
MM-Would OP say the same thing of other women who married into the Royal Family, or does he think that of Meghan only?
X-Other women who have married into the royal family have not guest-edited magazines,
—So there’s your answer
MM-Here is a list of the Royals who have guest edited magazines/radio shows. Meghan is not a pioneer…just following in the family footsteps. Great to see Duchess Meghan join other senior members of the Royal Family in guest editing at a high profile outlet — Prince Charles co-edited @Countrylifemag in 2018, Prince Harry guest edited @BBCr4today in 2017 and Duchess Kate was guest editor of @HuffPostUK in 2016.
MM-Kate must be fuming. She only got the Huff Post as she has zero experience of writing and editing, and Meghan, who wrote and ran her own lifestyle blog, gets British Vogue.
X-If appearing on the cover of Vogue was considered boastful, then what the fk was all this about Smeg?
—Hmm? No comment? Thought as much.
MM-Half the outraged queens attacking Meghan for this wouldn’t say a word if it were Kate doing it (or Diana when she was alive).
MM-Mainly ridiculously pompous American Queens posting on the forum [R141]. Do not pretend otherwise. Even if you truly believe some lessons in frugality should be learned by some members of the RF, it would never excuse the likes of vitriol spewed here on this page. The very audacity to legitamise this sort of hate speech, including up to calling for her to be murdered is unexplainable. You’re all very sick twisted sorts on the page….wicked even.
X-Your American brekkie is rife with red herrings, and dodgy bloater paste. Keep at it though, as I’m thoroughly enjoying the free entertainment you’re providing me. I’m also cracking up at X overuse of British-isms. Methinks the lady doth protest too much.
X-No dear…and I’ll say this sloooooowwwwwly….it’s about being extravagant when someone else is paying the bill. Those people being the taxpayer. You’re not the brightest, clearly….but can you at least understand that much? And “we all know” nothing. For you, Markle is a walking skin colour – and every time you post, you display that. You should be ashamed of yourself, but racists rarely are.
X-Evidently the recently hired (and paid for by the Commonwealth Taxpayer) PR palace staffers for Me & Dim have found their way to the DL.Only bowing, scraping and forelock tugging is allowed henceforth. By decree.
“…what Meghan wants, Meghan gets…”
see offsite link on theguardian.com
—They’re HHHEEEEEEEEEEEERRREE!!!!
MM-No one goes from an a list acting career to marrying a Royal because they think it’s a good career move. They do it out of pure love.That moment when Harry lifted Megan’s veil, it was something out of a fairytale. For one thing she looked stunning (she could have been a model if she hadn’t pursued acting) and another, there was nothing but true love and adoration on both of their faces. They adore each other, and it’s a wonderful thing to watch.
X-F and F the disgusting Queen Catherine Troll:
‘Yacht girl Kate is dismal and talentless. Meghan can act well and write well; Kate can do neither. All she can do is breed, flash her ass at the military and go on 500k vacations.’
X-I am just cringing with embarrassment for these sad delusional Meghan stans who are too dumb to see the forest for the trees. You can always tell who they are by their abject immaturity “You’re jealous!” “You’re jealous!” Just like a petulant little child. Trust me sweetie, there’s nothing to envy about butt ugly spongbob shaped no talent wannabe Markle. When we have Catherine?? Please. Your racism is embarrassing. Please get higher standards. Why do you look down on yourself so much that you worship trash? All you spew is proven lies. Town and country as a reliable source is hilarious. Is it a prerequisite for Meghan supporters to be so incurably stupid or is that just your natural inclination?
X-Here’s a clue:
Most gay men loathe her because they are clear-eyed. The only gay men who “like” her are the ones who stand to gain from her. Some women love her because they are into the “fairytale”
But most of the pro-Meghan comments seem robotic and odd. I don’t say Russia. I think it’s a PR putsch. Now go back over the thread and divide it up along those lines ad
X-Meghan is garnering hate and derision wherever she goes, and for good reason. She’s doing a terrible and deeply embarrassing job, with smugness, attention-seeking and vulgar ostentation.
X-She’s a nightmare for people who love the Royal Family and who want the institution to last. Every Royalist in the country is crossing fingers that Smug and Mug divorce soon and she goes back to America permanently. Sorry, but those are the facts, and they’re not changing soon.**ahem*** (PRETENDING TO BE RMM)
It has come to my attention that there are people on this thread who are criticizing ME. First of all, I would like to remind all of you that it is forbidden to talk about me, or the Duke of Sussex, or our child, or our dogs, unless I have approved it–and you know this.
But it needs to be said that despite the fact that you are HATERS (who of course are gonna hate), you cannot impel me from bringing about the WINDS of CHANGE and GROWTHFULNESS that we WOMEN WHO MATTER are bringing to the world. As I was saying to my besties George and Amal Clooney, CHANGE sows the seeds of IMPACTFULNESS that allows you to BE YOUR BEST SELF and LIVE YOUR BEST LIFE. This is something I learned from Oprah, who is another of my besties. You cannot stop me from using my position to BE THE VOICE THAT MATTERS for those who do not know THEY ARE LOVED–I am here to IMPACT them.
BE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO BE IN THE WORLD.
And stop talking about me or my husband or my child or my dogs. You have already been reported.
And no photos!
—HRH the Duchess of Sussex
… it’s because Vogue is an aspirational magazine for all women who need THE INSPIRATION not just to keep going but to BE THE BEST THEY CAN BE. If they can aspire to BE LIKE ME, and to LIVE MY KIND OF LIFE (as they all do), yet all the while not acrtually speaking to me nor stroking my dogs nor taking photos near me, they will LIVE THEIR BEST LIVES. THE BIGGEST ADVENTURE they can ever take is to LIVE THE LIFE OF THEIR DREAMS, and since they dream of being me, I can help them ACTUALIZE THEIR POTENTIALS.
—HRH the Duchess of SussexWhat fun! Thank you….they are here a lot by the way….😁❤️❤️❤️❤️