Every man, woman and intermediately-sexed individual is free to interpret and communicate self by means of any sexual practices at all, regardless of ethical, legal or religious concerns, etc, provided that all parties are fully aware of all implications and responsibilities and heartily agree.
However, if a woman asks why a man wants to kiss her, he may choke her into submission.
Mutual consent is a condition. But such consent is not always explicit. Behaviour seen by one person as seduction or rape may be considered to be emancipation or initiation by another.
All possible acts are permissible with all possible partners, whatever you sexual predilections may be.
All children shall be accustomed from infancy to witness every type of sexual act to prevent a fog of falsehood and mystery stupefying their minds which “might thwart and misdirect the growth of their subconscious system of soul-symbolism.”
Incest, adultery and paederasty, “which everyone now practices with humiliating precautions” are authorized.
Murder of a faithless partner is ethically excusable, …because there may be some stars whose nature is extreme violence.
The motto accompanying these sexual acts is “excess”. (Every man and woman is a star.)
1. Any kind of sex.
2. Violence.
3. Children.
III,43: Let the Scarlet Woman beware! If pity and compassion and tenderness visit her heart; if she leave my work to toy with old sweetnesses; then shall my vengeance be known. I will slay me her child: I will alienate her heart: I will cast her out from men: as a shrinking and despised harlot shall she crawl through dusk wet streets, and die cold and an-hungered. (Book of Law)
Regarding child sacrifice, Aleister Crowley in his Magic in Theory and Practice makes plain what is consistent with the Book of the Law references. He writes that only the Master of the Temple can say whether any given act is a crime. In response to expressions of horror from “the ignorant” about killing innocent children, the “knower” will rush to strangle the child and remark that the child “will become Nero”, who was as necessary as Julius Caesar.There are other explicit references in the OTO material to child sacrifice and consumption of a baby’s flesh, although this is not a direct admission that it was practiced by Crowley. See Crowley’s Sex-Magical Instructions, Of the Secret Marriages of Gods with Men, A Secret Instruction of the Eighth Degree.
And what does it mean, in Crowley’s Rites of Eleusis when one participant asks, “Are the brethren fed?” and the answer is, “Upon the corpses of their children”? Is this “poetry” too? And when Crowley explains the following in his Magick in Theory and Practice ( http://www.rahoorkhuit.net/library/crowley/magick.html ) are we supposed to think of this as a metaphor?
It is unwise to condemn the practice of savages who tear the heart and liver from an adversary and consume them while warm.
To achieve the highest spiritual working you must choose the victim which contains the greatest and purest force.
A perfectly innocent and highly intelligent male child is the best victim.
Bloody, human sacrifice is best.
Sorry to break it to you folks but that’s exactly what they believe in. I’ve no desire to follow the LHP…